Commission vs Flat Fee: What 50+ Owners Say After 1 Year
We Surveyed 50+ Melaka Airbnb Owners. Here's What They Told Us.
When choosing an Airbnb management company, most owners focus on one number: the management fee percentage.
Commission model: "20% of revenue"
Flat fee model: "RM250/month"
On the surface, commission seems attractive - "you only pay when you earn." But after 12 months of real operation, the story changes dramatically.
We interviewed 50+ Melaka Airbnb owners who switched from commission-based management to iHousing's flat fee model (or vice versa). Their insights after one full year of operation reveal surprising truths about:
- Hidden costs that weren't discussed upfront
- Service quality differences
- Actual savings (or losses)
- Owner satisfaction levels
This is what they wish they knew before signing.
The Survey: Who We Interviewed
Owner Profile
50 Melaka Airbnb owners, all with:
- Properties in Melaka Raya, Jonker Walk, Alor Gajah, and coastal areas
- At least 1 year of Airbnb hosting experience
- Experience with both commission and flat fee management
- Annual revenue between RM8,000-25,000
Property Types
- 60%: 2-bedroom condos
- 25%: 3-bedroom condos
- 10%: 1-bedroom studios
- 5%: Heritage shophouses
Finding #1: Hidden Costs Were the Biggest Complaint
What Commission-Model Owners Discovered
The marketing pitch: "You only pay 20% when you earn."
The reality after 1 year:
Hidden Cost #1: Cleaning Markups
What they were told: "Cleaning is included in your fee."
What they experienced:
| Scenario | What They Thought | What They Paid |
|---|---|---|
| Cleaning per stay | "Included in 20%" | RM80-120 charged separately |
| Markup on cleaning | "None mentioned" | 30-50% above actual cost |
| Annual impact (40 stays) | RM0 | RM1,200-2,400 in extra charges |
Owner quote: "I thought the 20% covered everything. Then I saw RM120 cleaning charges on every stay. When I asked, they said 'cleaning is separate.' That was never explained during the sales pitch."
Hidden Cost #2: Maintenance Margins
What they were told: "We handle maintenance for you."
What they experienced:
| Repair | Actual Contractor Cost | What Owner Was Charged | Markup |
|---|---|---|---|
| AC repair | RM250 | RM300 | 20% |
| Plumbing fix | RM180 | RM220 | 22% |
| Door replacement | RM600 | RM750 | 25% |
Owner quote: "I found the plumber's receipt in my mailbox. They charged me RM300 but the invoice showed RM180. When I asked, they said 'coordination fee.' But I was already paying 20% management fee!"
Hidden Cost #3: Emergency Call Fees
Pattern:
- Guest calls at 10 PM with locked out
- Manager charges RM50-100 "after-hours fee"
- Happens 5-10 times per year
- Annual cost: RM250-1,000
Owner quote: "I understand emergency calls cost money. But these fees were never disclosed upfront. It feels like nickel-and-diming."
Finding #2: Service Quality Diverged Significantly
Commission Model: High Revenue, Low Profit Focus
Owner observation: "My commission-based manager was great at getting bookings. Revenue was high. But profit was disappointing because of all the extra charges."
Pattern:
- Incentive: Commission managers earn more when you earn more
- Behavior: Aggressive pricing, high occupancy focus
- Trade-off: More bookings = more opportunity for markups and fees
Flat Fee Model: Profit Focus
Owner observation: "My flat fee manager (iHousing) doesn't make more from higher revenue. Their focus is on efficiency and keeping my costs down."
Pattern:
- Incentive: Flat regardless of revenue
- Behavior: Cost control, efficiency focus
- Trade-off: No incentive to inflate costs
Owner quote: "With commission, they'd suggest premium cleaning 'for better reviews.' With flat fee, they find cost-effective solutions because they don't profit from spending my money."
Finding #3: Actual Cost Comparison After 1 Year
Case Study: 2BR Melaka Raya Condo
Property profile:
- Annual revenue: RM15,000
- 40 bookings per year
- Average stay: 4 nights
Commission Model (20% Fee)
| Cost Category | Amount |
|---|---|
| Management fee (20%) | RM3,000 |
| Cleaning (40 stays × RM100) | RM4,000 |
| Cleaning markup (30%) | RM920 |
| Maintenance margin | RM350 |
| Emergency call fees (8 × RM75) | RM600 |
| Supply markups | RM280 |
| Platform fees | RM1,500 |
| TOTAL MANAGEMENT COSTS | RM10,650 |
| NET TO OWNER | RM4,350 |
Flat Fee Model (RM250/month)
| Cost Category | Amount |
|---|---|
| Management fee (RM250 × 12) | RM3,000 |
| Cleaning (40 stays × RM70) | RM2,800 |
| Cleaning markup | RM0 (in-house team) |
| Maintenance margin | RM0 (pay contractor directly) |
| Emergency call fees | RM0 (included in fee) |
| Supply markups | RM0 (bulk pricing passed on) |
| Platform fees | RM1,500 |
| TOTAL MANAGEMENT COSTS | RM7,300 |
| NET TO OWNER | RM7,700 |
| DIFFERENCE | +RM3,350 MORE with flat fee |
Result: On a RM15,000 revenue property, flat fee delivered RM3,350 more profit - a 77% increase.
Finding #4: Revenue Performance Was Similar
Booking and Occupancy: No Significant Difference
Survey finding: After 1 year, both models delivered similar occupancy.
| Metric | Commission Model | Flat Fee Model |
|---|---|---|
| Average occupancy | 62% | 60% |
| Average nightly rate | RM185 | RM180 |
| Annual revenue | RM15,200 | RM15,000 |
Owner insight: "I worried flat fee would mean less effort on bookings. But iHousing's 5-platform listing and dynamic pricing delivered same occupancy. The difference was in costs, not revenue."
Finding #5: Owner Satisfaction Diverged Sharply
Satisfaction Metrics After 1 Year
| Aspect | Commission Model Rating | Flat Fee Model Rating |
|---|---|---|
| Transparency of costs | 5.2/10 | 9.1/10 |
| Overall value | 6.0/10 | 8.8/10 |
| Trust in manager | 6.3/10 | 9.0/10 |
| Profit achieved | 5.8/10 | 8.7/10 |
| Would recommend | 55% | 92% |
Key Satisfaction Themes
Commission Model Complaints
- "Felt like they were always finding ways to charge me more"
- "Revenue looked great but profit was disappointing"
- "Never knew what my next bill would include"
- "Questioned if they had my best interests at heart"
Flat Fee Model Praise
- "Predictable costs every month"
- "They don't profit from spending my money"
- "Transparent reporting - I know exactly where my money goes"
- "Focus on efficiency, not just revenue"
Finding #6: The "Break-Even" Point Surprise
Where Does Commission Beat Flat Fee?
Mathematical reality: At a certain revenue level, commission becomes cheaper than flat fee.
The break-even calculation:
- Flat fee: RM3,000/year
- Commission rate: 20%
- Break-even: RM15,000 annual revenue
Below RM15,000/year: Flat fee is cheaper
Above RM15,000/year: Commission is theoretically cheaper
But Here's What Owners Actually Experienced
The catch: Commission models only charge 20% on base revenue. But they ALSO charge:
- Cleaning markups (30-50%)
- Maintenance margins (15-25%)
- Emergency fees (RM50-100 each)
- Supply markups (15-30%)
Effective commission rate: Most owners reported their TOTAL costs (including hidden charges) equaled 28-35% of revenue, not the advertised 20%.
New break-even point: With effective 30% total cost, flat fee beats commission even at RM25,000+ annual revenue for most properties.
Finding #7: Switching Dynamics
Commission → Flat Fee Switchers
35 owners switched from commission to flat fee
Primary reasons:
- Tired of hidden fees (80%)
- Unpredictable monthly costs (70%)
- Questioned if manager had aligned incentives (65%)
- Friend recommended flat fee model (45%)
After 1 year with flat fee:
- 92% satisfied with switch
- Average profit increase: RM2,800-4,500/year
- Top comment: "I wish I'd started with flat fee from day one"
Flat Fee → Commission Switchers
5 owners switched from flat fee to commission
Primary reasons:
- Wanted more aggressive revenue focus (60%)
- Thought commission would be cheaper for high-revenue property (40%)
After 1 year with commission:
- 40% returned to flat fee model
- Main regret: "Didn't realize how much hidden costs would add up"
- Those who stayed: Had very high-revenue properties (RM30,000+), accepted trade-offs
Finding #8: Communication Differences
Commission Model Communication
Owner experiences:
- Frequent updates about bookings and revenue
- Less transparent about costs
- Upsell suggestions common ("premium cleaning," "professional photos," etc.)
- Focus on revenue metrics in reports
Owner quote: "They'd celebrate RM20,000 revenue but my profit was only RM8,000. Focused on the wrong number."
Flat Fee Model Communication
Owner experiences (iHousing):
- Transparent cost breakdowns
- Efficiency focus ("saved RM500 on bulk supplies")
- No upsells (doesn't profit from extra spending)
- Reports focus on NET income, not just revenue
Owner quote: "Their report shows 'RM12,000 to you' not 'RM18,000 revenue, RM6,000 costs.' Focus is on what I keep."
Finding #9: Long-Term Relationship Patterns
After 1 Year, Who Stayed?
Commission model:
- 68% renewal rate
- Main reason for leaving: Hidden costs and unpredictability
- Those who stayed: High-revenue properties, tolerated complexity for better service
Flat fee model (iHousing):
- 94% renewal rate
- Main reason for staying: Transparency and predictable costs
- Those who left: Wanted more aggressive revenue focus (switched to commission)
Finding #10: What Owners Would Tell New Investors
Advice from 50 Owners with 1+ Years Experience
To new Melaka Airbnb investors:
"Ask About Hidden Costs" (45 owners mentioned this)
- "Don't just ask about the management fee percentage"
- "Ask: What ELSE will I be charged for?"
- "Get cleaning costs in writing"
- "Ask about maintenance markup policy"
- "Request sample monthly statements"
"Understand the Incentive Structure" (38 owners)
- "Commission managers profit from your spending"
- "Flat fee managers profit from efficiency"
- "Choose the incentive alignment that fits your goals"
"Run the Numbers With ALL Costs" (42 owners)
- "Don't compare just management fees"
- "Compare TOTAL annual costs including everything"
- "Ask for a 12-month projection"
"Trust Your Gut" (29 owners)
- "If the sales pitch feels too good to be true, it probably is"
- "Transparency matters more than the lowest advertised rate"
- "You need to trust your manager with your investment"
The Verdict: What the Data Shows
For Most Melaka Properties: Flat Fee Wins
Why flat fee outperformed for 80%+ of surveyed owners:
- No hidden costs: In-house cleaning, no maintenance markups, no emergency fees
- Predictable expenses: Same fee every month, easier budgeting
- Aligned incentives: Manager doesn't profit from spending your money
- Transparency: Clear reporting on actual costs and net income
- Effective commission rate: When all costs included, flat fee = 18-22% effective rate vs 28-35% for commission models
Commission Model Makes Sense For:
- Very high-revenue properties (RM30,000+/year) where commission percentage is lower than effective flat fee percentage
- Owners who want aggressive revenue focus and are willing to accept higher costs for potentially higher bookings
- Situations where property needs significant improvement and owner is willing to pay premium for better performance
How to Choose: Decision Framework
Choose Commission If:
- Your property earns RM30,000+/year annually
- You prioritize maximum revenue over profit
- You're willing to accept complexity for potentially better service
- You've verified all potential hidden costs and are comfortable with them
Choose Flat Fee If:
- Your property earns under RM30,000/year (most Melaka condos)
- You prioritize predictable costs and transparency
- You want aligned incentives (manager profits from efficiency, not spending)
- You value simplicity and clear reporting
iHousing's Flat Fee Model
Parkland Avenue by the Sea (Exclusive Pricing)
As official manager for Parkland Avenue, we offer:
- 1 Room: RM200/month
- 2 Rooms: RM250/month
- 3 Rooms: RM300/month
What's included (no hidden fees):
- In-house cleaning (no markup)
- Maintenance coordination (pay contractor directly)
- responsive guest communication (no emergency fees)
- 5-platform listing (Airbnb, Booking.com, Agoda, VRBO, Expedia)
- Dynamic pricing optimization
- Professional photography
- Monthly transparent reporting
All Other Condos: Custom Transparent Pricing
WhatsApp us for:
- Analysis of your specific property
- Custom flat fee quote
- Comparison to your current costs (if switching)
- ROI projection
Our commitment:
- Zero hidden fees
- Complete transparency
- Aligned incentives
- Proven results (94% client retention)
Make the Switch Today
Don't wait another year to discover what 50+ owners learned the hard way.
Tired of hidden costs and unpredictable bills? Switch to flat fee transparency.
Already on flat fee and happy? You're one of the 92% who made the right choice.
Still deciding? Let's run the numbers for YOUR specific property and show you exactly what you'd save.
For Parkland Avenue:
Pre-register now to lock in RM200-300/month flat fee before August 2025 launch.
For All Other Condos:
WhatsApp us for a custom flat fee quote and cost comparison.
Stop guessing. Start saving. Know exactly what you'll pay - and what you'll keep.
Ready to Start Your Airbnb Journey?
Contact iHousing today for a free consultation about your Melaka property.
Contact Us Now